Ja čujem nešto jako tiho i to tek kad je pojačano do maksimuma.
Veli vam ja da mi mozak odapinje :(
Printable View
Ja čujem nešto jako tiho i to tek kad je pojačano do maksimuma.
Veli vam ja da mi mozak odapinje :(
aaa, ivarov najbolji prijatelj dobio mobitel, dida mu ga kupio.
na to je ivar odma isao zvati svoju nonu.
uz plakanje kako je za mene opasan, a nije za druge, kako drugima daju, a vi meni ne ce proci sljedeci dani cini mi se
Malac nas je pilao za mobitel od kad je došao. Hrpa njih je u razredu imala. Imali smo pravi rat u kući mjesecima, jer smo rekli da mu mobitel nećemo kupiti, niti ćemo dozvoliti da mu netko pokloni.
Kad je u 5. razredu krenuo na treninge izvan naselja, tri tramvajske stanice - pola sata hoda, tada smo kupili mob (i potajno odahnuli) a on je nastavio pilato kako mob ništa ne valja. Bon od 50 kn potroši brzinom munje.
Naivno smo mislili da će mobitel poslužit tome da nas mali obavijesti kad kasni, ili da ga možemo nazvat kad se zabrinemo. Pogrešno! Potroši bon pa ostavi mob doma, čujemo da zvoni u sobi.
U početku je mobitel služio isključivo tome da nas nazove izvana 5 minuta prije nego se treba vratit doma i pita može li ostati još malo. :mrgreen:
Iskreno, mislim da je i s 12 godina prerano dobio mobitel, ali bili smo već na rubu snaga od te mobitelske drame.
plakanje za mobilnim u nasoj kuci traje vec par meseci. bez rezultata. rekli smo gospodjici (1. razred) da ce ga dobiti onda kad pocne da ostaje sama kod kuce i sama odlazi u skolu. moguce da ce to biti vec sledece sk. godine. uz naravno, gasenje aparata na nastavi.
inace, mobitele smatram nuznim zlom kod dece nizih razreda. tuzno je sto su postali statusni simbol cak i kod tako male dece...
Cujem!! I tako sam sretna... A MM ne cuje...Kako ima mladu zenu! :lol:
F (6 g.) ga čuje, a O (3 g.) ne - ali samo na Vatrenoj lisici.
Ja ga čujem samo desnim uhom.
Na IE ga svi čujemo bez greške.
Isto tako ako ga otvorim sa QTP ne čujemo ga,
a sa BSP svi.
nikakne stignem, al evo dosla sam prijavit da oskar vec jedno 3 tjedna ima mobitel
dala sam mu ga nakon sto sam jedan dan, dok sam isla s posla, ostala bez benzina, pa je potrajalo dok sam nasla nekog ko ce mi dostavit benzin i bla bla... a ko za vraga niko ziv kog sam zvala nije mogao taj cas otici po Oskara, te kad sam ja konacno, 40-tak minuta nakon naseg dogovora dolsa po njega - njega nigdje nije bilo!
i da skratim - otisao je pjesice jer mu je bilo dosadno cekati mene, a meni i uciteljici skratio zivot za par sati pa sam mu odma sljedeci dan dala telefon tak da mu mogu javit da cu zakasnit ili da ga mogu nazvat i pitat DI SI???
dogovor je da je mob. u ruksaku za slape i uciteljica je dozolila da ga u 14,30 stavlja ispod stola u razredu kako bi mogao cuti da ga zovem - mora biti u skoli sve dok ga ja ne nazovem da krene doma (ide od skole pa do izlaza iz pothodnika sam)
a prosli tjedan je cak dva dana za redom pozelio ici s autobusom doma i dozvolila sam mu - bas je bio ponosan sto je dosao sam doma iz skole i sto se sam vozio u busu - moram li reci da me, od kad izadje iz skole, pa dok ne dodje doma, nazove bar 5 puta d ami nesto veli :lol:
bas sam u subotu nesto komentirala s curama o mobitelu pa su me uvjerile da nema potrebe jer svaka skola ima govornicu, uciteljice brojeve telefona roditelja itd.
i sad si me s ovim smutila skroz.
kaj ak ja ostanem bez benzina (a mogla bi, ne bi mi bilo prvi put)? kaj ak isti taj put kad ostanem bez benzina ostavim mobitel i novcanik doma (a mogla bi, i to mi se cesto dogodi :roll: )?
joj, joj, joj, kak ste vi prezivjele ovu godinu prije nego su vam klinci krenuli u skolu, ja cu pocet patit od kronicnog proljeva, svaki put kad pomilim na skolu trcim na zahod :mrgreen:
moj drugasic od ove sk godine ide sam u skolu, i to ne blizu. otkad je krenuo sam u skolu, ima mobitel. lakse mi je tako.
Moja A neće dobiti mobitel (iako se mu nada kao poklonu za prvu pričest). Ima tel. karticu, a kraj škole je govornica. Imaju prvao naznavi i iz zbornice roditelje ako ne dolaze po dijete. Učiteljica ima mobiteli dala nam je broj, pa mogu uvijek nju nazvati. Mogu nazvati i zbornicu ili bilo koji ured. Ja mislim da joj mob stvarno ne treba.
ja nisam skuzila u nasoj skoli govornicu
ivar ne nosi mob u skolu, cak je i sam rekao da ga ne zeli nositi (nije mu valjda njegov mob dovoljno cool, sto je jos gore od toga da ga zeli nositi :cry: )
imamo brojeve telefona i uciteljice i uciteljice iz boravka pa je situacija bez benzina pokrivena
uciteljica me je zvala sama na mob kad je u skoli s njim bio neki problem (plakanje i sl)
Nema mobitel jer nema potrebe za tim. Škola, stan, moj i mužev posao nam je sve u krugu 15-20 minuta, u školu i na posao idemo pješice ili biciklima tako da se ne može dogoditi da itko ostane bez benzina. Kad je pitala za mobitel rekli smo joj da će ga dobiti kad bude navršila 10 godina i to je to..ne pita i ne plače niti traži. Razmišljam kako bi se i ja vrlo rado riješila mobitela jer ga smatram prilično štetnim po zdravlje i jer narušava privatnost, zato ga koristim vrlo rijetko a ponekad ga namjerno ostavljam doma i ne nosim sa sobom.
Kopiram link na članak i zaključak u članku koji se odnosi na izloženost djece svim Elektromagnetskim poljima i uporabi mobiltela:
Ukratko Medicinska Preporuka je : ograničite vrijeme poziva, koristite hands free i da je mobitel cim dalje od djecjeg tijela i glave,
The Sensitivity of Children to Electromagnetic Fields
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/116/2/e303
located on the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.
Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All
and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk
publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published,
PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
by on October 18, 2007 www.pediatrics.org Downloaded from
SPECIAL ARTICLE
DEVELOPING POLICY FOR CHILDREN AND
PREGNANT WOMEN
In today’s world, technologic developments bring both social and economic benefits to large sections of society; however, the health consequences of these developments can be difficult to predict and manage. Nevertheless, even if the effects are small, a widespread exposure can have large public health consequences. When risks are complex, an established cause-effect relationship is absent, or the scientific findings are not robustly quantifiable, the need for timely preventive action makes a precautionary approach an essential part of policy making. Many societies believe that this is particularly true regarding children (including the unborn child): they represent the future of the society, have the potential for
longer exposure than adults, and yet are less able to manage their own risk.
International guidance on occupational and public exposure to EMFs, described above, is based on avoiding risks to health that are well understood and for which there is good scientific evidence. However,
with regard to childhood exposure to EMFs (and exposure during pregnancy), several factors argue for the adoption of precautionary measures, including the possibility that EMFs might affect children;
the dread with which some of the diseases raised in this context, such as leukemia and brain cancer, are perceived; the involuntary nature of some of the exposure; its extensiveness; and its likely rapid growth in the future.
The WHO International EMF Project (www.who.int/emf) is finalizing a practical framework for guiding policy options in areas of scientific uncertainty that is based on the application of precaution.68 In
general terms, the draft WHO precautionary framework aims to develop a set of public health policy options that can be applied according to the degree of scientific uncertainty and the anticipated severity
of the harm that might ensue from exposure, taking into account the size of the affected population and the cost of exposure reduction. These measures should not be seen as undermining science-based
guidance on exposure; rather, they represent additional steps with application that may vary from country to country depending on social and economic considerations.
Precautionary measures may also be adopted at an individual level, depending on the degree of concern felt by the exposed person. In giving advice to their patients, physicians should weigh the strength of
scientific evidence for the risk, if any, of an adverse outcome, the benefits of the technology, and the feasibility of reducing exposure, as well as the overall health of the patient, which includes freedom from worry and anxiety.
For ELF (power-frequency) fields, there is some evidence that exposure to environmental magnetic fields that are relatively high but well below guidance levels is associated with an increase in the risk of childhood leukemia, a very rare disease (even if the risk is doubled, it remains small at 5–8 per 100 000 children per year). Although the evidence is
regarded as insufficient to justify more restrictive limits on exposure, the possibility that exposure to ELF magnetic fields increases risk cannot be discounted. For the physician faced with questions from, for example, a couple planning a family and concerned about this issue, or from someone pregnant and occupationally exposed to relatively high ELF magnetic fields, standardized advice is not possible. Instead, physicians could inform their patients of possible risk and advise them to weigh all the
advantages and disadvantages of the options available to them (of which EMF reduction is but one consideration). Some simple options include reducing exposure by minimizing the use of certain electrical
appliances or changing work practices to increase distance from the source of exposure. People living near overhead power lines should be advised that such proximity is just an indicator of exposure
and that homes far away from power lines can have similar or higher fields.
Regarding the long-term health effects of mobilephone
use, the paucity of data, particularly for children,
suggests that low-cost precautionary measures
are appropriate, especially because some of the exposures
are close to guideline limits. Physicians
could advise parents that their children’s RF exposure
can be reduced by restricting the length of calls
or by using hands-free devices to keep mobile
phones away from the head and body. On the other
hand, exposure levels from mobile-phone base stations
are extremely low, and therefore precautionary
measures do not need to be recommended.
moja S ga dobila na kraju drugog razreda i super mi dođe da ga ima, a M ga možda dobi na kraju prvog obećo mu tata i nemam ništ protiv
:lol:Citiraj:
maria71 prvotno napisa