da li su ljudi koji neinformirani do kraja krecu u ivf sebicni da dobiju dijete i da li je posteno ici na dijete ako je neko svjestan rizika i zna cemu se izlaze? tko je recimo bitniji, to dijete koje se radja necijom zrelom odlukom ili roditelj koji toliko zeli bioloskog potomka?
takodjer je nemoguce nekome tko je zaceo prirodno shvatiti te dileme i tu borbu da bi se dobilo dijete
nekako mi tu spada i prenatalna dijagnostika i radjanje djeteta za koje znate da dolazi na svijet drugacije
smatram da je ok da je u medicinskim file-ovima napomena da je dijete zaceto ivf cisto djetetove sigurnosti radi
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...icineandhealth
Children born after IVF treatment 'face higher health risks'
Children born to couples who have undergone fertility treatment are more likely to be diagnosed with autism, cancer and other disorders such as cerebral palsy and mental retardation, researchers claimed yesterday.
The higher risk to child health is believed to be caused by medical problems in the parents, such as diabetes and hypertension, damaging the child in the womb, but doctors conducting the study said IVF and other fertility treatments may also play a role. Medical records of children born after their parents sought fertility treatment showed they were four times more likely to have autism than those born to fertile parents.
Childhood cancers including leukaemia and brain tumours also rose.
The risk of more minor problems, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, rose by 40%, and other medical conditions affecting hearing and sight nearly doubled. Children had a 30% higher chance of being admitted to neonatal intensive care units and to stay in hospital for more than three days if they were born following fertility treatment, the study found.
The researchers stressed the figures represent relative risks. In July researchers at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital in London reported the prevalence of autism to be 0.39% in the general population, a figure that will include some children born to parents aided by fertility treatment. A fourfold rise in the risk of autism would see a child's chances of having the condition increase to 1.56%.
Mary Croughan at the University of California in San Francisco studied 2,000 women who either gave birth naturally after a long period of infertility, or conceived after a variety of fertility treatments, and compared them with 2,000 fertile mothers who gave birth between 1994 and 1998. More than 19,000 medical records were used to build up a picture of the women's pregnancies and deliveries and the health of their children up to six years of age.
The researchers found infertile women had more complications such as pre-term labour and pre-eclampsia, more delivery difficulties and caesarean sections. Children born to infertile women were 20% more likely to have low birth weights and were twice as likely to show evidence of poor growth in the womb. Speaking at the American Association for
Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) conference in New Orleans, Dr Croughan said that medical conditions more common in infertile couples may be to blame for the rise in childhood health problems. She said: "The vast majority of children born to infertile couples are healthy, but if a couple has any risk factors that could lead to a child not being born healthy, then those should of course be taken into consideration."
Clare Brown, chief executive of Infertility Network UK, said "continual research" was needed to ensure "treatment is safe for couples and potential children".
 |
|||
Odgovori s citatom
fritulica1 prvotno napisa
