Iako me je cak malo i zabavila analogija da se ni dva hetero muskarca ne smiju vjencati, zapravo je super primjer za "false analogy" logicku pogresku. A takvih je vise i u mujicinim postovima i u UIO argumentaciji (ako tu postoji razlika uopce)
Arguing by analogy is probably always inferior to arguing a case directly since analogy forces us to leave the subject at hand to argue in other terms.* Analogies can be wonderfully useful when trying to help someone visualize something they’ve never seen (“the shores of the great lakes are sort of like the shores of the ocean”) or understand a new concept (“a four-year university is sort of like a two-year college”).* We have to make sure, though, that the things being compared are fundamentally similar and not fundamentally dissimilar in ways that matter.

Isto tako kohabitacija uistinu nije fundamentalna za brak.