Citiraj:
SikaPika prvotno napisa
ti si, Stray cat sebi stvorila (a i još neki na ovom forumu) neku sliku u glavi o svećenicima, ne znam, pedofilima, pervertitima pa su onda valjda svi takvi, da, fašisti, šovinisti i govnari
ajd oladi, ženo!
nego kaj, zazmirimo na sva moguca zlostavljanja i pobjegnimo u sarkasticno "pa onda su svi valjda takvi" jer ces takvom mastovitom interpretacijom ponistiti gadosti koje dio ljudi u svecenickim odorama prakticira ali ih se zbog taboo-a, sramote i slicnih nepisanih pravila ispravnog ponasanja ne prijavljuje pogotovo u manje urbanim i informiranim sredinama (da ne velim zaostalim i zatucanim)
nekako nisam primjetila da se u tolikoj kolicini spominju pripadnici bilo koje druge profesije u skandalima sa djecom kao pojedinci iz svecenstva
da ne velis da lamacem samo po katolickoj crkvi jos malo o tome gdje je crta ispravnog ponasanja
"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister... It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband's house, rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."
["Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990]
http://ethnikoi.org/iran.html